Antony Garcia
Eng 654
Professor Wexler
30 Oct. 2013
Eng 654
Professor Wexler
30 Oct. 2013
Bibliography
"Cloned Foods." Washington Times, The. Jan 02 2007. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/409931643?accountid=7285>
A brief article focusing on the suffrage and the multiple health defects of the cloning process of animals ranging from dysfunctional hearts and brains to high failures and premature death. The article also questions the ethics of the FDA and its involvement in regulation.
"EU Cloned Food Talks Collapse." Wall Street Journal Mar 29 2011 ProQuest.
23 Oct. 2013. Online.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/858948563?accountid=7285
Article covers the disparity of objectives of the United Kingdom and that of the economic union of Europe. The UK originally pushed for acceptance and no legislation of cloned meat products, but facing strong opposition by citizens, opted to pass legislation mandating food producers to label meat and dairy products arising from cloned animals.
Feight, Jennie, and Nashat Zuraikat. "Cloned Food Labeling: History, Issues, and
Bill S. 414." International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 3.2 (2009): 149-63. ProQuest. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Detailed article citing historical issues and parallels of genetic modifications and clone technology. Although impartial, authors present a final note of concern as the technology is fairly new in regard to meat for consumption as opposed to other genetically modified organisms. Several implications are covered including economic, ethical, political and technological.
“Is America Ready to Eat Beef From Cloned Animals?” Philadelphia Inquirer.
Jan 16 2008. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/287573249?accountid=7285>.
This article is a mostly balanced review of the science, and lack of certainty in the cloning technology of animals. Most importantly, it looks at rhetorical aspects of the need for further testing of cloned meat, and the influence that the food industry holds in Washington.
Malone, Sam. "Cloned Food Safe, Claim Scientists." Western Mail. Nov 27 2010:
17. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online.
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/814379162?accountid=7285>
Highly charged but balanced article citing the positions of government, science, consumers, farmers, and organic industry as well as the question of the certainty of science as the article makes a specific connection to Mad Cow Disease.
Shatin, Leo. "Cloned Foods." South Florida Sun – Sentinel. Jan 13 2007. ProQuest.
23 Oct. 2013.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/389872021?accountid=7285
This brief, highly charged, article has a clear slant toward opposition of cloned meat, and
looks mostly at rhetorical aspects of why the FDA refuses to label meat, as cloned, and implicates the government in this position as a “dictatorship.”
"Cloned Foods." Washington Times, The. Jan 02 2007. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/409931643?accountid=7285>
A brief article focusing on the suffrage and the multiple health defects of the cloning process of animals ranging from dysfunctional hearts and brains to high failures and premature death. The article also questions the ethics of the FDA and its involvement in regulation.
"EU Cloned Food Talks Collapse." Wall Street Journal Mar 29 2011 ProQuest.
23 Oct. 2013. Online.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/858948563?accountid=7285
Article covers the disparity of objectives of the United Kingdom and that of the economic union of Europe. The UK originally pushed for acceptance and no legislation of cloned meat products, but facing strong opposition by citizens, opted to pass legislation mandating food producers to label meat and dairy products arising from cloned animals.
Feight, Jennie, and Nashat Zuraikat. "Cloned Food Labeling: History, Issues, and
Bill S. 414." International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 3.2 (2009): 149-63. ProQuest. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Detailed article citing historical issues and parallels of genetic modifications and clone technology. Although impartial, authors present a final note of concern as the technology is fairly new in regard to meat for consumption as opposed to other genetically modified organisms. Several implications are covered including economic, ethical, political and technological.
“Is America Ready to Eat Beef From Cloned Animals?” Philadelphia Inquirer.
Jan 16 2008. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/287573249?accountid=7285>.
This article is a mostly balanced review of the science, and lack of certainty in the cloning technology of animals. Most importantly, it looks at rhetorical aspects of the need for further testing of cloned meat, and the influence that the food industry holds in Washington.
Malone, Sam. "Cloned Food Safe, Claim Scientists." Western Mail. Nov 27 2010:
17. ProQuest. 23 Oct. 2013. Online.
<http://search.proquest.com/docview/814379162?accountid=7285>
Highly charged but balanced article citing the positions of government, science, consumers, farmers, and organic industry as well as the question of the certainty of science as the article makes a specific connection to Mad Cow Disease.
Shatin, Leo. "Cloned Foods." South Florida Sun – Sentinel. Jan 13 2007. ProQuest.
23 Oct. 2013.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/389872021?accountid=7285
This brief, highly charged, article has a clear slant toward opposition of cloned meat, and
looks mostly at rhetorical aspects of why the FDA refuses to label meat, as cloned, and implicates the government in this position as a “dictatorship.”